Chapter 6: Redefining Inquiry in Science
- Critical thinking and content knowledge are interdependent and best learned simultaneously (Hirsch and Willingham in Schmoker 165).
- We learn content by analyzing and evaluating as we learn.
- We need fewer science standards taught more deeply. Reduce current standards by 50% (p.178-179 tells you how).
- Any experiments/labs must be richly tied to the content.
- “You can’t do scientific work without being a regular reader of scientific articles. Reading textbooks prepares you to read scientific articles.” (Hall in Schmoker 174).
- Teachers need to model reading and thinking aloud based on science texts. Students need to be shown how to annotate and refer to graphics/charts. (176)
- Interactive lecture can be the backbone of a lesson. (Ch. 3 of Focus outlines the components for interactive lecture.)
- Teachers need to develop common assessments and exemplars for each grading period.
- Assessments should include multiple choice and essay response.
- Students should be given the assessments up front so they know what to expect.
- Assessments should be open-book/notes, so students can support their conclusions and arguments with textual evidence.
- One end of grading period essay question response should be expanded into a longer paper. (3-5 pages)
- Schmoker does address the grading of these writing assignments – science teachers are not language arts teachers and should evaluate students’ written work on content, clarity and logic (and with a rubric). (184)
- Students should read selections from the textbook and supplemental and current articles related to science.
- Teachers have to model close reading and annotation of these texts.
- Writing and note taking, consistently implemented, contribute tremendously to learning science content. (192)
No comments:
Post a Comment